Triopticus was named and described by a large team of paleontologists led by Michelle Stocker. As part of their investigation, they scanned the skull using a CT scanner to view the interior of the enlarged skull roof. CT scans revealed a well-preserved brain case and semicircular canals within the bones.
Additionally, they found that the enlarged skull bones had three distinct zones. The first zone, closest to the braincase consisted of normal bone tissue. The second zone made up the core of the enlarged bone tissue and was quite dense. The third zone made up the exterior bone tissue and was less dense than the second zone, and was heavily ornamented with round bumps. The bumps cover almost the entire surface of the bone, including the sides of the pit.
The pit has no known function, although the authors suggest that it may be an epiphenomenon; in other words, it's an area of the skull roof that never expanded, so that as the areas around it expanded through ontogeny, a deep pit formed. A secondary hypothesis that the authors consider less likely, is that the pit represents a pineal eye, a light sensing patch of skin that communicates directly to the pineal gland in the brain. They regard this as less likely because there is no clear communication from the pit to the brain in the fossil, and no archosauriforms are known to retain pineal eyes.
Triopticus is superficially quite similar to the pachycephalosaurs, the bone-headed dinosaurs of the Cretaceous. Like Triopticus, pachycephalosaurs have a central forehead dome and enlarged cranial bosses. They even have three-part bone zonation. Unlike Triopticus however, no pachycephalosaur has a cranial pit. Additionally, the three-part bone zonation is of a different style in pachycephalosaurs, which have the densest bone tissue near the surface. Lastly, no domed pachycephalosaur is known from before the Late Cretaceous, 140 million years after Triopticus lived.
To determine where Triopticus fell in the family tree of reptiles, Stocker and colleagues performed a phylogenetic analysis including several different reptile groups. They found that Triopticus was a non-archosaur archosauriform. Archosaurs live on today as birds and crocodilians, and include many extinct groups such as non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs. Archosauriforms include the archosaurs and their close kin including such reptiles as Proterosuchus, Erythrosuchus, and Euparkeria. All of the archosauriforms in this part of the tree were semi-sprawling quadrupeds with long snouts, so it's likely that Triopticus was also a long-snouted quadruped based on its location on the reptile family tree.
The authors noted that several archosaur lineages that lived later in the Mesozoic have remarkably similar body plans to unrelated archosauriform groups in the Triassic. Besides Triopticus and the pachycelosaurs, the authors mention four other repeated body plans. First are armored quadrupeds represented in the Triassic by the aetosaurs and later in the Mesozoic by ankylosaurs. Next were gracile herbivores represented in the Triassic by silesaurids and later in the Mesozoic by primitive ornithischian dinosaurs. Another repeated body plan is the long-snouted carnivores, represented in Triassic by phytosaurs, and later in the Mesozoic by thalattosuchians, spinosaurids, and gharials. Lastly, a toothless, beaked, bipedal body plan is found in the Triassic shuvosaurids, and seen again in ornithomimosaurs.
All of the these Triassic groups went extinct by the end of the Triassic, many falling victim to another mass-extinction. The authors theorize that the repeated body types seen in Triassic and later Mesozoic archosauriforms may have been constrained by similar selective pressures as dinosaurs and crocodilians evolved to fill niches left empty by the mass extinction.
Original findings published on Current Biology.
Pete
Buchholz
Senior Writer
